Watercraft speed control device

ABSTRACT

An automatic speed control system that provides desired watercraft velocity over land. The coupled algorithms correct engine speed and torque using inertia based measurements, GPS, and tachometer measurements, and the corrections are augmented and enhanced by velocity/speed and torque/speed relationships that are dynamically and adaptively programmed with real-time data collected during replicated operations of the watercraft in specified conditions.

This patent claims priority from and incorporates by reference U.S.Patent Application Ser. No. 60/543,610, filed Feb. 11, 2004, and is acontinuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/056,848filed Feb. 11, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,229,330.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention pertains to the field of water sports and boating.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Competitors in trick, jump, and slalom ski and wakeboard events requiretow boats capable of consistent and accurate speed control. Intricatefreestyle tricks, jumps, and successful completion of slalom runsrequire passes through a competition water course at precisely the samespeed at which the events were practiced by the competitors. Some eventsrequire that a pass through a course be made at a specified speed. Suchrequirements are made difficult by the fact that typical watercraftPitot tube and paddle wheel speedometers are inaccurate and measurespeed over water instead of speed over land, and wind, wave, and skierloading conditions constantly vary throughout a competition pass.

Marine transportation in general suffers from the lack of accuratevessel speed control. The schedules of ocean-going vessels for whichexact arrival times are required, for example, are vulnerable to thevagaries of wind, waves, and changing hull displacement due to fueldepletion.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides consistent, accurate control ofwatercraft speed over land. It utilizes velocity measuring device and aninertia based measurement device technology to precisely monitorwatercraft velocity over land. It utilizes dynamic monitoring anddynamic updating of engine control data in order to be responsive toreal-time conditions such as wind, waves, and loading.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the steady state timer algorithm used in theembodiment.

FIG. 3 is a schematic of a watercraft utilizing an embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the engine speed and boat speeddata shown in the tables herein.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of an alternate embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of an alternate embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of an alternate embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 12 is a flow diagram of an alternate embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 13 is a flow diagram of another embodiment of the presentinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is an electronic closed-loop feedback system thatcontrols the actual angular velocity ω_(a) of a boat propeller, and,indirectly, the actual over land velocity v_(a) of the watercraftpropelled by that propeller. The system has various configurations withone embodiment including a velocity measuring device, an inertia-basedmeasuring device, at least two conversion algorithms, and engine speedcontrols. Other configurations include a global positioning satellite(GPS) velocity measurement device, a marine engine speed tachometer,comparators, conversion algorithms, and engine speed controls.

Herein, a GPS device is one of the category of commonly understoodinstruments that use satellites to determine the substantially preciseglobal position and velocity of an object. Such position and velocitymeasurements can be used in conjunction with timers to determine anobject's instantaneous velocity and average velocity between two points.A velocity measuring device is one of a category of commonly understoodinstruments that is capable of measuring the velocity of an object forexample, a GPS device, a paddle wheel, or a pitot tube. An inertia basedmeasurement device is one of a category of commonly understoodinstruments that is capable of measuring the acceleration of an object.The velocity of an object can be calculated by integrating theacceleration of an object over time. Engine speed refers to angularvelocity, generally measured with a device herein referred to as atachometer. A comparator is any analog or digital electrical,electronic, mechanical, hydraulic, or fluidic device capable ofdetermining the sum of or difference between two input parameters, orthe value of an input relative to a predetermined standard. An algorithmis any analog or digital electrical, electronic, mechanical, hydraulic,or fluidic device capable of performing a computational process. Thealgorithms disclosed herein can be performed on any number of devicescommonly called microprocessors or microcontrollers, examples of whichinclude the Motorola® MPC555 and the Texas Instruments® TMS320.

As diagrammed in FIG. 1 showing feedback system 100, GPS device 10measures the actual velocity v_(a) of a watercraft 50. The GPS outputv_(GPS) is compared in first comparator 12 to predetermined velocityv_(d). Comparator 12 output velocity error ε_(v) is input to analgorithm 14 that converts ε_(v) to engine speed correction ω_(c) thatis input to a second comparator 16. Predetermined velocity v_(d) isinput to an algorithm 18 the output of which is ω_(adapt), a value ofengine speed adaptively determined to be the engine speed necessary topropel watercraft 50 at predetermined velocity v_(d) under theprevailing conditions of wind, waves, and watercraft loading, trimangle, and attitude.

The addition of engine speed correction ω_(c) and engine speed ω_(adapt)in comparator 16 results in the total desired engine speed ω_(d) that isinput to a third comparator 20. A sensor 24, one of many types ofcommonly understood tachometers, detects the actual angular velocityω_(a) of a driveshaft from an engine 53 of watercraft 50 and sends it tothird comparator 20. In comparator 20 actual angular velocity ω_(a) andtotal desired engine speed ω_(d) are compared for engine speed errorε_(ω) that is input to an algorithm 26. In the algorithm 26 engine speederror ε_(ω) is converted into engine torque correction τ_(c).

Total desired engine speed ω_(d) is also input to an algorithm 22 theoutput of which is τ_(adapt), a value of engine torque adaptivelydetermined to be the engine torque necessary to operate watercraftengine 53 at total desired engine speed ω_(d). The addition of enginetorque τ_(adapt) and engine torque correction τ_(c) in a fourthcomparator 28 results in the calculated desired engine torque τ_(d).Calculated desired engine torque τ_(d) is input to controller 30 thatdrives a throttle control capable of producing in engine 53 a torquesubstantially equal to calculated desired engine torque τ_(d).

The algorithms 14 and 26, respectively, could include any common oradvanced control loop transfer function including, but not limited to,series, parallel, ideal, interacting, noninteracting, analog, classical,and Laplace types. For both the algorithms 14 and 26 the embodimentutilizes a simple proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithm ofthe following type (exemplified by the algorithm 14 transfer function):ω_(c) =K _(p)ε_(v) +K _(d)(d/dt)ε_(v) +∫K _(i)ε_(v) dt.Where K_(p), K_(d), and K_(i) are, respectively, the appropriateproportional, derivative, and integral gains.

The algorithms 18 and 22, respectively, provide dynamically adaptivemapping between an input and an output. Such mapping can be described asself-modifying. The inputs to the algorithms 18 and 22 are,respectively, predetermined velocity v_(d) and total desired enginespeed ω_(d). The outputs of the algorithms 18 and 22 are, respectively,engine speed ω_(adapt) and engine torque τ_(adapt). The self-modifyingcorrelations of algorithms 18 and 22 may be programmed during replicatedcalibration operations of a watercraft through a range of velocities ina desired set of ambient conditions including, but not limited to, wind,waves, and watercraft loading, trim angle, and attitude. Data tripletsof watercraft velocity, engine speed, and engine torque are monitoredwith GPS technology and other commonly understood devices and fed toalgorithms 18 and 22 during the calibration operations. Thereafter, asubstantially instantaneous estimate of the engine speed required toobtain a desired watercraft velocity and a substantially instantaneousestimate of the engine torque required to obtain a desired engine speedcan be fed to the engine speed and torque control loops, even in theabsence of watercraft velocity or engine speed departures from desiredvalues, in which cases the outputs of algorithms 14 and 26 may be zero.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, no adaptive data point of watercraftvelocity, engine speed, or engine torque described above is programmedinto algorithms 18 or 22 until it has attained a steady state conditionas diagrammed in FIG. 2. A timer compares watercraft velocity errorε_(v), engine speed error ε_(ω), the time rate of change of actualwatercraft velocity v_(a), and the time rate of change of actual enginespeed ω_(a) to predetermined tolerance values. When the absolute valueof each variable is less than or equal to its predetermined tolerance,and the time elapsed since the beginning of a sample event is greaterthan or equal to a predetermined validation time, ω_(adapt) is updatedaccording toω_(adapt)(v _(d))=ω_(adapt)(v _(d))+k _(adapt)[ω_(d)−ω_(adapt)(v_(d))]Δt_(update)where k_(adapt) and Δt_(update) are factory-set parameters that togetherrepresent the speed at which the adaptive algorithms “learn” or developa correlated data set. The last block on the FIG. 2 flowchart representsa correction to speed control algorithm 14. The correction may be usedto smooth iterations that may be present if algorithm 14 uses integratoraction.

When engine speed error ε_(ω) and the time rate of change of actualengine speed ω_(a) decrease to predetermined tolerance values, and thetime elapsed since the beginning of a sample event is greater than orequal to a predetermined validation time, τ_(adapt) is updated accordingtoτ_(adapt)(ω_(d))=τ_(adapt)(ω_(d))+k_(adapt)[τ_(d)−τ_(adapt)(ω_(d))]Δt_(update).This is the same updating equation that is used in algorithm 18, and itis derived in the same manner as is illustrated in FIG. 2. The smoothingtechnique described above may be used to counter the effects ofintegrator action in algorithm 26.

The substantially instantaneous estimates of engine speed and torquederived from algorithms 18 and 22 require interpolation among thediscrete values programmed during watercraft calibration operation. Forpractice of the present invention there are many acceptableinterpolation schemes, including high-order and Lagrangian polynomials,but the present embodiment utilizes a linear interpolation scheme. Forexample, algorithm 18 employs linear interpolation to calculate a valueof ω_(adapt) for any predetermined velocity v_(d). From a programmedtable of v_(d) values from v₀ to v_(n), inclusive of v_(m), andω_(adapt) values from ω₀ to ω_(n), inclusive of ω_(m), a value of m ischosen so that v_(d)≧v_(m) and v_(d)<v_(m+1). Algorithm 18 calculatesintermediate values of engine speed according to the equationω_(adapt)=ω_(m)+[(v _(d) −v _(m))/(v _(m+1) −v _(m))](ω_(m+1)−ω_(m)).Although algorithm 22 could also utilize any of several interpolationschemes, and is not constrained to duplication of algorithm 18, in thepresent embodiment of the present invention, algorithm 22 calculatesτ_(adapt) using the same linear interpolation that algorithm 18 uses tocalculate ω_(adapt). In order to implement adaptive update algorithm 18when using a linearly interpolated table of values as the interpolationembodiment, the following procedure can be followed:

-   -   Compute a weighting factor x using the following equation:        x=[(v _(d) −v _(m))/(v _(m+1) −v _(m))]        -   Note that x is always a value between 0 and 1.            Similar to algorithm 18, update the two bracketing values            ω_(m), ω_(m+1) in the linear table using the following            equations:            ω_(m)=ω_(m)+(1−x)k _(adapt)[ω_(d)−ω_(adapt) ]Δt _(update)            ω_(m+1)=ω_(m+1)+(x)k _(adapt)[ω_(d)−ω_(adapt) ]Δt _(update)            The other values in the linear table remain unchanged for            this particular update, and are only updated when they            bracket the operating condition of the engine at some other            time. This same procedure can be used on the engine speed            vs. torque adaptive table. It should be noted that if            algorithm 18 is not present, then ω_(c) will equal            ω_(adapt). Likewise if algorithm 22 is not present then            τ_(c) will equal τ_(adapt).

Although the embodiment shown in FIG. 1 does not utilize extrapolationin its adaptive algorithms, the scope of the present invention couldeasily accommodate commonly understood extrapolation routines forextension of the algorithm 18 and algorithm 22 data sets.

Adaptive algorithms 18 and 22 are not required for operation of thepresent invention, but they are incorporated into the embodiment. Aidedby commonly understood integrators, algorithms 14 and 26 are capable ofultimate control of a watercraft's velocity. However, the additionaladaptive control provided by algorithms 18 and 22 enhances the overalltransient response of system 100.

The following table is an example of the velocity vs. engine speedadaptive table as it might be initialized from the factory. This tableis a simple linear table which starts at zero velocity and extends tothe maximum velocity of the boat (60 kph) at which the maximum enginespeed rating (6000 rpm) is also reached.

v_(d) (kph) ω_(adapt) (rpm) 0 0 10 1000 20 2000 30 3000 40 4000 50 500060 6000The following is an example of the velocity vs. engine speed adaptiveafter the boat has been driven for a period of time:

v_(d) (kph) ω_(adapt) (rpm) 0 0 10 1080 20 1810 30 2752 40 3810 50 500060 6000Note that the engine speed values correlating to boat speeds of 50 and60 kph have not been modified from the original initial values. This isbecause the boat was never operated at these desired speeds during theperiod of operation between the present table and the initialinstallation of the controller. FIG. 4 is a graphical representation ofthe data in the preceding tables.

Controller 30 (see FIG. 1) is the interface between calculated desiredengine torque τ_(d) and the throttle control that causes the ultimatechanges in engine speed. Controller 30 may interpose any number ofrelationships between calculated desired engine torque τ_(d) and enginespeed, but the embodiment of the present invention utilizes a directproportionality. Other embodiments of the present invention could usecontroller 30 to adjust engine parameters other than throttle setting.Such parameters could include spark timing, fuel flow rate, or air flowrate. The embodiment of the present invention contemplates a boat with asingle speed transmission and a fixed pitch propeller. An alternateembodiment of the present invention could be used with boats havingvariable transmissions and/or variable pitch propellers. In thesealternate embodiments, the controller 30 could adjust the transmission,pitch of the propeller, throttle setting, or a combination thereof.

FIG. 3 illustrates how an operator of watercraft 50 controls the speedof engine 53 and propeller 51. The operator supplies predetermined anddesired velocity v_(d) through control keypad and display 59 to controlmodule 65 that houses the algorithms and comparators of system 100. GPSmeasurements from device 10 and predetermined velocity v_(d) values aresent to control module 65 via communications link 55. Communication link57 feeds engine speed measurements from a tachometer to control module65. System 100 may be overridden at any time through operator control ofmanual throttle control 61 that controls engine throttle 63.

Diagrammed in FIG. 5 is feedback system 101 which is an alternateembodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the comparator12 is removed from system 101. The velocity measurement determined bythe GPS device 10 is fed directly to algorithm 14. Algorithm 14 ismodified to incorporate predetermined velocity v_(d) and GPS outputv_(GPS) in the calculation to determine engine speed correction ω_(c).

Diagrammed in FIG. 6 is feedback system 102 which is another embodimentof the present invention. In this embodiment, system 102 incorporates aninertia measuring device 11, an algorithm 15, an algorithm 17, and avelocity measuring device 31. The inertia measuring device 11 measuresthe actual acceleration a_(Acc) of a watercraft 50 and the velocitymeasuring device 31 measures the actual velocity v_(VMD) of the samewatercraft 50. The output of the inertia measuring device 11 is inputinto algorithm 15 that converts actual acceleration a_(Acc) to velocityv_(Acc) according to the formulav_(Acc)=∫a_(Acc)dtThe output from algorithm 15 velocity v_(Acc) and velocity v_(VMD) areinput into algorithm 17 which calculates observed velocity v_(OBS)according to the formulav _(OBS) =K _(P)(v _(VMD) −v _(Acc))+K _(D)(d/dt)(v _(VMD) −v _(Acc))=∫K_(i)(v _(VMD) −v _(Acc))In this embodiment algorithm 14 is modified to incorporate predeterminedvelocity v_(d), observed velocity v_(OBS), actual acceleration a_(Acc),and predetermined acceleration a_(d) in the calculation to determineengine speed correction ω_(c).

As shown in FIG. 7, for feedback system 102 it is also possible toincorporate a comparator to determine the velocity magnitude differencebetween the desired velocity v_(d) and the observed velocity v_(OBS).Likewise, it is possible to incorporate another comparator to determinethe acceleration magnitude difference between the desired accelerationa_(d) and actual acceleration a_(Acc). The algorithm 14 would bemodified to incorporate the velocity magnitude difference and theacceleration magnitude difference in the calculation to determine enginespeed correction ω_(c).

For system 102 and other systems which incorporates the use of a inertiameasuring device, the algorithms 14 and 26, respectively, could includeany common or advanced control loop transfer function including, but notlimited to, series, parallel, ideal, interacting, noninteracting,analog, classical, and Laplace types. For both the algorithms 14 and 26the embodiment utilizes a simple proportional-integral-derivative (PID)algorithm of the following type (exemplified by the algorithm 14transfer function):ω_(c) K _(p)ε_(v) +K _(d)ε_(a) +∫K _(i)ε_(v) dt.Where K_(p), K_(d), and K_(i) are, respectively, the appropriateproportional, derivative, and integral gains.

Diagrammed in FIG. 8 is feedback system 103 which is an alternateembodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, system 103incorporates an inertia measuring device 11, and a velocity measuringdevice 31. The inertia measuring device 11 measures the actualacceleration a_(Acc) of a watercraft 50 and the velocity measuringdevice 31 measures the actual velocity v_(VMD) of the same watercraft50. The algorithm 14 is modified to incorporate desired velocity v_(d),desired acceleration a_(d), actual acceleration a_(Acc), and actualvelocity v_(VMD) in the calculation to determine engine speed correctionω_(c).

As shown in FIG. 9, for feedback system 103 it is also possible toincorporate a comparator to determine the velocity magnitude differencebetween the desired velocity v_(d) and the actual velocity v_(VMD).Likewise, it is possible to incorporate another comparator to determinethe acceleration magnitude difference between the desired accelerationa_(d) and actual acceleration a_(Acc). The algorithm 14 would bemodified to incorporate the velocity magnitude difference and theacceleration magnitude difference in the calculation to determine enginespeed correction ω_(c).

Diagrammed in FIG. 10 is feedback system 106 which is another embodimentof the present invention. In this embodiment, system 106 incorporates aninertia measuring device 11 without a velocity measuring device. Theinertia measuring device 11 measures the actual acceleration a_(Acc) ofa watercraft 50. The algorithm 14 is modified to incorporate desiredvelocity v_(d), desired acceleration a_(d), and actual accelerationa_(Acc) in the calculation to determine engine speed correction ω_(c).

As shown in FIG. 11, for feedback system 106 it is also possible toincorporate a comparator to determine the acceleration magnitudedifference between the desired acceleration a_(d) and actualacceleration a_(Acc). The algorithm 14 would be modified to incorporatethe acceleration magnitude difference in the calculation to determineengine speed correction ω_(c).

Diagrammed in FIG. 12 is feedback system 108 which is another embodimentof the present invention. In this embodiment, system 108 incorporates avelocity measuring device 31 and a GPS device 10 both of which capableof measuring the velocity of watercraft 50. The velocity measuringdevice measures velocity v_(VMD) and the GPS device measures velocityv_(GPS) of the same watercraft 50. In this embodiment, algorithm 14 ismodified to incorporate desired velocity v_(d), velocity v_(VMD), andvelocity v_(GPS) in the calculation to determine engine speed correctionω_(c).

Diagrammed in FIG. 13 is feedback system 109 which incorporates analgorithm 17 and comparator 12. The output of the velocity measuringdevice 31 v_(VMD) and the output of the GPS device measures velocityv_(GPS) are input into algorithm 17 which calculates observed velocityv_(OBS) according to the formulav _(OBS) =K _(P)(v _(VMD) −v _(GPS))+K _(D)(d/dt)(v _(VMD) −v _(GPS))=∫K_(i)(v _(VMD) −v _(GPS))

Observed velocity v_(OBS) may be sent to either comparator 12 oralgorithm 14. If observed velocity v_(OBS) is sent to comparator 12,then comparator 12 determines the velocity magnitude difference betweenthe desired velocity v_(d) and the observed velocity v_(OBS). Comparator12 output velocity error ε_(v) is input to an algorithm 14 that convertsε_(v) to engine speed correction ω_(c) that is input to a secondcomparator 16. If observed velocity v_(OBS) is sent to algorithm 14, inthis embodiment algorithm 14 is modified to incorporate predeterminedvelocity v_(d) and observed velocity v_(OBS) in the calculation todetermine engine speed correction ω_(c).

It will be apparent to those with ordinary skill in the relevant arthaving the benefit of this disclosure that the present inventionprovides an apparatus for controlling the velocity of a watercraft. Itis understood that the forms of the invention shown and described in thedetailed description and the drawings are to be taken merely as examplesand that the invention is limited only by the language of the claims.The drawings and detailed description presented herein are not intendedto limit the invention to the particular embodiments disclosed. Whilethe present invention has been described in terms of alternateembodiments and a few variations thereof, it will be apparent to thoseskilled in the art that form and detail modifications can be made tothat embodiment without departing from the spirit or scope of theinvention.

1. An apparatus for controlling the velocity of a watercraft having anengine for propulsion, said apparatus comprising: an inertia measurementdevice capable of obtaining a measurement of the acceleration of saidwatercraft; a predetermined desired velocity of said watercraft and apredetermined desired acceleration of said watercraft; an engine speedalgorithm capable of creating a first engine speed output correctionfrom said predetermined desired velocity, said predetermined desiredacceleration, and said acceleration measurement; and said first enginespeed output correction being capable of causing said watercraft to bepropelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.
 2. An apparatusfor controlling the velocity of a watercraft having an engine forpropulsion, said apparatus comprising: an inertia measurement devicecapable of obtaining a measurement of the acceleration of saidwatercraft; a predetermined desired velocity of said watercraft and apredetermined desired acceleration of said watercraft; an accelerationcomparator capable of determining the acceleration magnitude differencebetween said predetermined desired acceleration and said accelerationmeasurement; an engine speed algorithm capable of creating a firstengine speed output correction from said predetermined desired velocityand said acceleration magnitude difference; and said first engine speedoutput correction being capable of causing said watercraft to bepropelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.
 3. An apparatusas in claims 1 or 2 further comprising: an engine control module capableof using said first engine speed output correction to cause saidwatercraft to be propelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.4. An apparatus as in claim 1 or 2 further comprising: a tachometerdevice capable of measuring the speed of said engine propelling saidwatercraft; an engine torque algorithm capable of creating a firstengine torque output correction from said first engine speed outputcorrection and said tachometer speed measurement; and said first enginetorque output correction being capable of causing said watercraft to bepropelled at substantially.
 5. An apparatus as in claim 4 furthercomprising: an engine control module capable of using said first enginetorque output correction to cause said watercraft to be propelled atsubstantially said predetermined velocity.
 6. An apparatus as in claim 4wherein said engine torque algorithm includes an advanced control loopfunction.
 7. An apparatus as in claim 6 wherein said advanced controlloop function is selected from the group consisting of a series, aparallel, an ideal, an interacting, a noninteracting, an analog, aclassical, and a Laplace function.
 8. An apparatus as in claim 4 whereinsaid engine torque algorithm is selected from the group consisting of aproportional-integral-derivative algorithm, a proportional algorithm, anintegral algorithm, and a derivative algorithm.
 9. An apparatus as inclaim 4 further comprising: an additional engine torque algorithmcapable of creating a second engine torque output correctioncorresponding to an input representative of said first engine speedoutput correction of said engine speed algorithm, said second enginetorque output correction representing a dynamic historical value of thetorque required to change the engine speed of an engine propelling saidwatercraft an amount approximately equal to said first engine speedoutput correction of said engine speed algorithm; and a torquecomparator capable of summing said first engine torque output correctionof said engine torque algorithm and said second engine torque outputcorrection of said additional engine torque algorithm, said sum beingcapable of causing said watercraft to be propelled at substantially saidpredetermined velocity.
 10. An apparatus as in claim 9 wherein saidadditional engine torque algorithm is capable of building a table ofdiscrete data pairs of engine speed correction and torque required toproduce said engine speed correction as said watercraft is repeatedlyoperated for calibration over a prevailing set of ambient conditions,said additional engine torque algorithm being capable of determininginterpolated and extrapolated data points among and extending from saiddata pairs collected during said calibration operation of saidwatercraft.
 11. An apparatus as in claim 10 wherein said additionalengine torque algorithm is capable of determining a condition ofpredetermined change in a predetermined parameter prior to updating saidtable.
 12. An apparatus as in claim 9 wherein said additional enginetorque algorithm is capable of building a table of discrete data pairsof engine speed and torque required to produce said engine speed as saidwatercraft is repeatedly operated for calibration over a prevailing setof ambient conditions, said additional engine torque algorithm beingcapable of determining interpolated and extrapolated data points amongand extending from said data pairs collected during said calibrationoperation of said watercraft.
 13. An apparatus as in claim 12 whereinsaid additional engine torque algorithm is capable of determining acondition of predetermined change in a predetermined parameter prior toupdating said table.
 14. An apparatus as in claim 4 wherein said enginespeed algorithm includes an advanced control loop function.
 15. Anapparatus as in claim 4 wherein said engine speed algorithm is selectedfrom the group consisting of a proportional-integral-derivativealgorithm, a proportional algorithm, an integral algorithm, and aderivative algorithm.
 16. An apparatus as in claim 1 or 2 furthercomprising: a tachometer device capable of measuring the revolutions perminute of a drive shaft of said engine propelling said watercraft; anengine torque algorithm capable of creating a first engine torque outputcorrection from said first engine speed output correction and saidtachometer revolutions per minute measurement; and said first enginetorque output correction being capable of causing said watercraft to bepropelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.
 17. An apparatusas in claim 16 further comprising: an engine control module capable ofusing said first engine torque output correction to cause saidwatercraft to be propelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.18. An apparatus as in claim 16 wherein said engine speed algorithmincludes an advanced control loop function.
 19. An apparatus as in claim16 wherein said engine speed algorithm is selected from the groupconsisting of a proportional-integral-derivative algorithm, aproportional algorithm, an integral algorithm, and a derivativealgorithm.
 20. An apparatus as in claim 16 wherein said engine torquealgorithm includes an advanced control loop function.
 21. An apparatusas in claim 16 wherein said engine torque algorithm is selected from thegroup consisting of a proportional-integral-derivative algorithm, aproportional algorithm, an integral algorithm, and a derivativealgorithm.
 22. An apparatus as in claim 16 further comprising: anadditional engine torque algorithm capable of creating a second enginetorque output correction corresponding to an input representative ofsaid first engine speed output correction of said engine speedalgorithm, said second engine torque output correction representing adynamic historical value of the torque required to change the enginespeed of an engine propelling said watercraft an amount approximatelyequal to said first engine speed output correction of said engine speedalgorithm; and a torque comparator capable of summing said first enginetorque output correction of said engine torque algorithm and said secondengine torque output correction of said additional engine torquealgorithm, said sum being capable of causing said watercraft to bepropelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.
 23. An apparatusas in claim 1 or 2 further comprising: a tachometer device capable ofmeasuring the speed of said engine propelling said watercraft; anadditional engine speed comparator capable of determining the enginespeed error between said first engine speed output correction and saidtachometer speed measurement an engine torque algorithm capable ofcreating a first engine torque output correction from said engine speederror; and said first engine torque output correction being capable ofcausing said watercraft to be propelled at substantially saidpredetermined velocity.
 24. An apparatus as in claim 23 furthercomprising: an engine control module capable of using said first enginetorque output correction to cause said watercraft to be propelled atsubstantially said predetermined velocity.
 25. An apparatus as in claim23 wherein said engine speed algorithm includes an advanced control loopfunction.
 26. An apparatus as in claim 23 wherein said engine speedalgorithm is selected from the group consisting of aproportional-integral-derivative algorithm, a proportional algorithm, anintegral algorithm, and a derivative algorithm.
 27. An apparatus as inclaim 23 wherein said engine torque algorithm includes an advancedcontrol loop function.
 28. An apparatus as in claim 23 wherein saidengine torque algorithm is selected from the group consisting of aproportional-integral-derivative algorithm, a proportional algorithm, anintegral algorithm, and a derivative algorithm.
 29. An apparatus as inclaim 23 further comprising: an additional engine torque algorithmcapable of creating a second engine torque output correctioncorresponding to an input representative of said first engine speedoutput correction of said engine speed algorithm, said second enginetorque output correction representing a dynamic historical value of thetorque required to change the engine speed of an engine propelling saidwatercraft an amount approximately equal to said first engine speedoutput correction of said engine speed algorithm; and a torquecomparator capable of summing said first engine torque output correctionof said engine torque algorithm and said second engine torque outputcorrection of said additional engine torque algorithm, said sum beingcapable of causing said watercraft to be propelled at substantially saidpredetermined velocity.
 30. An apparatus as in claims 1 or 2 furthercomprising: an additional engine speed algorithm capable of creating asecond engine speed output correction corresponding to an inputrepresentative of said predetermined velocity, said second engine speedoutput correction representing a dynamic historical value of the speedof an engine propelling said watercraft at a velocity approximatelyequal to said predetermined velocity; and an engine speed comparatorcapable of summing said first engine speed output correction of saidengine speed algorithm and said second engine speed output correction ofsaid second algorithm; and said sum capable of causing said watercraftto be propelled at approximately said predetermined velocity.
 31. Anapparatus as in claim 30 further comprising: an engine control modulecapable of using said sum of said first engine speed output correctionof said engine speed algorithm and said second engine speed outputcorrection of said additional engine speed algorithm to cause saidwatercraft to be propelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.32. An apparatus as in claim 30 wherein said additional engine speedalgorithm is capable of building a table of discrete data pairs ofvelocity magnitude and engine speed of said watercraft as saidwatercraft is repeatedly operated for calibration over a prevailing setof ambient conditions, said additional engine speed algorithm beingcapable of determining interpolated and extrapolated data points amongand extending from said data pairs collected during said calibrationoperation of said watercraft.
 33. An apparatus as in claim 32 whereinsaid additional engine speed algorithm is capable of determining acondition of predetermined change in a predetermined parameter prior toupdating said table.
 34. An apparatus as in claim 30 wherein said enginespeed algorithm includes an advanced control loop function.
 35. Anapparatus as in claim 30 wherein said engine speed algorithm is selectedfrom the group consisting of a proportional-integral-derivativealgorithm, a proportional algorithm, an integral algorithm, and aderivative algorithm.
 36. An apparatus as in claims 1 or 2 wherein saidengine speed algorithm includes an advanced control loop function. 37.An apparatus as in claim 36 wherein said advanced control loop functionis selected from the group consisting of a series, a parallel, an ideal,an interacting, a noninteracting, an analog, a classical, and a Laplacefunction.
 38. An apparatus as in claims 1 or 2 wherein said engine speedalgorithm is selected from the group consisting of aproportional-integral-derivative algorithm, a proportional algorithm, anintegral algorithm, and a derivative algorithm.
 39. An apparatus forcontrolling the velocity of a watercraft having an engine forpropulsion, said apparatus comprising: an inertia measurement devicecapable of obtaining a measurement of the acceleration of saidwatercraft; a predetermined velocity of said watercraft; a predeterminedacceleration of said watercraft; a tachometer device capable ofmeasuring the speed of said engine propelling said watercraft; analgorithm capable of creating a first engine torque output correctionfrom said tachometer speed measurement, said predetermined velocity,said acceleration measurement, and said predetermined acceleration; andsaid first engine torque output correction being capable of causing saidwatercraft to be propelled at substantially said predetermined velocity.40. An apparatus for controlling the velocity of a watercraft having anengine for propulsion, said apparatus comprising: an inertia measurementdevice capable of obtaining a measurement of the acceleration of saidwatercraft; a predetermined velocity of said watercraft; a predeterminedacceleration of said watercraft; an acceleration comparator capable ofdetermining the acceleration magnitude difference between saidpredetermined desired acceleration and said acceleration measurement; atachometer device capable of measuring the speed of said enginepropelling said watercraft; an algorithm capable of creating a firstengine torque output correction from said tachometer speed measurement,said predetermined velocity, and said acceleration magnitude difference;and said first engine torque output correction being capable of causingsaid watercraft to be propelled at substantially said predeterminedvelocity.
 41. An apparatus as in claims 39 or 40 further comprising: anengine control module capable of using said first engine torque outputcorrection to cause said watercraft to be propelled at substantiallysaid predetermined velocity.
 42. An apparatus as in claims 39 or 40wherein said algorithm includes an advanced control loop function. 43.An apparatus as in claim 42 wherein said advanced control loop functionis selected from the group consisting of a series, a parallel, an ideal,an interacting, a noninteracting, an analog, a classical, and a Laplacefunction.
 44. An apparatus as in claims 39 or 24 wherein said algorithmis selected from the group consisting of aproportional-integral-derivative algorithm, a proportional algorithm, anintegral algorithm, and a derivative algorithm.